Articles Posted in Fraud

Published on:

The LJM Preservation and Growth Fund, which trades under the symbols LJMIX, LJMAX, LJMCX, lost approximately $700 million, or approximately 80% of its value in the first week of February, 2018 leaving investors to wonder how a fund that calls itself “preservation and growth” could lose so much money so quickly.  In this article, we will explore how this happened, what LJMIX may have done wrong and what legal recourse investors may have against the fund.

False and Misleading Statements by LJM Preservation and Growth Fund

Before we discuss how the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJMIX) lost 80% of its value in a week, it is important to understand how the fund marketed itself.  The prospectus for the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund represented the following to investors, “the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund seeks capital appreciation and capital preservation with low correlation to the broader U.S. equity market…[t]he Fund aims to preserve capital, particularly in down markets (including major market drawdowns), through using put option spreads as a form of mitigation risk.”  We believe that these statements may have been materially false and/or intentionally misleading.

Published on:

Navellier & AssociatesAccording to a press release published by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 31, 2017, the SEC has issued fraud charges against Nevada-based investment advisory firm Navellier & Associates, as well as its founder and chief investment officer, Louis Navellier. Fitapelli Kurta is interested in hearing from investors who have complaints regarding Navellier & Associates.

The SEC’s complaint, according to the press release, alleges that “from 2010 to 2013, Mr. Navellier and his firm defrauded their clients and prospective clients, misleading them about the performance track record of the “Vireo AlphaSector” investment strategies that the firm offered under the “Vireo” brand name.” The release continues: “First, Mr. Navellier and his firm allegedly breached their fiduciary duty to clients and prospective clients by ignoring and concealing red flags that should have alerted them that the investment strategies had not performed as advertised. Second, Navellier & Associates allegedly distributed materially false advertisements and client communications about the performance track record of the investment strategies. Third, as Mr. Navellier and his firm realized their misrepresentations could get them in legal trouble, they allegedly sold the Vireo line of business in August 2013 for $14 million, rather than correcting their prior misrepresentations to their clients or informing their clients about their conflicts of interest in selling the Vireo business.”

The SC notes additionally that whereas the firm had claimed its customer assets were invested in the strategies from April 2001 through September 2008, and further that they had “significantly outperformed the S&P 500 Index” in that period, in reality no assets had tracked the strategy, and “even as a back-test the claimed performance was substantially overstated.” The charges, filed in a federal court in Boston, Massachusetts, remain pending.

Published on:

Patrick HowardPublic records published by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2, 2017 indicate that Dallas-based businessman Patrick Howard has been charged by the SEC with fraud. Fitapelli Kurta is interested in hearing from investors who have complaints regarding Mr. Howard.

According to an SEC press release dated February 16, 2017, “since February 2015, Patrick O. Howard and two Dallas-based companies he controls – Optimal Economics Capital Partners, LLC and Howard Capital Holdings, LLC – have raised approximately $13 million from 119 investors through the fraudulent offer and sale of interests in three private funds.” Mr. O’Howard and his companies allegedly told investors that their investments would yield returns between 12% and 20% “with minimal risk exposure,” and allegedly represented that “nearly all investor funds would be used to acquire the interests in the portfolio companies’ revenue streams, and that the promised returns were backed by insurance.” According to the SEC’s complaint, “these representations were false.” Mr. Howard and his companies allegedly “only used $7.5 million of the $13 million in investor funds to acquire revenue streams from portfolio companies and spent most of the rest on Howard’s personal expenses and on unrelated business expenses.” He also allegedly sent customers false account balances, encouraging them to reinvest funds, to “cover up” for the companies’ revenue’s insufficiency to support guaranteed minimum returns. “Additionally, Optimal Economics allegedly used new investor funds to make Ponzi-like payments to earlier investors,” the release states.

Finally, Mr. Howard allegedly also falsely represented to investors that he was a registered investment adviser, which he was not. After the SEC filed its complaint in a Dallas federal court, the court “issued a temporary restraining order halting the offering, as well as orders appointing a receiver over, and freezing, the defendants’ assets.” The SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, preliminary and permanent injunctions, prejudgment interest and civil penalties in the pending complaint.